Under intensity scrutiny, Vijay Singh started backpedaling from his previous comment on Annika Sorenstam playing the colonial. Rogers Cadenhead has already addressed the fallacy of Singh’s position. I’d like to know why Singh criticizes Sorenstam for accepting the exemption without criticizing the Bank of America Colonial for extending it.
Apparently Singh feels that the Augusta National has the right to choose who they associate with. That the Bank of America Colonial has the right to choose who they extend exemptions to. But that Sorenstam doesn’t have the right to accept that exemption. You can draw your own conclusion.